I am coming
before the school committee today to represent the faculty and staff of
Roosevelt Middle School, who are outraged at the thought of an innovation
school slated to be initiated in our building by September of 2013. Not only
were we not notified of this project in advance so that we could weigh in on
the prospectus and voice our opinions, our principal, Darcy Fernandes is listed
on page 12 of the prospectus for the Esperanza School of Language and Culture
as an “established partner” in the venture. Not at any time has Ms. Fernandes
come forward to state this fact to her faculty, and when questioned about the
proposal this summer, feigned ignorance of the project altogether, stating “I
don’t know anything about it; downtown never tells me anything.” In fact, the
only reason anyone at Roosevelt knows about the proposal is because myself,
along with a colleague, decided to attend the first meeting held by the United
Interfaith Action this summer regarding the unveiling of the proposals. This is
when we learned about the Esperanza School being slated for Roosevelt. We were
shocked, to say the least. Despite this so-called launching of the proposals
that night, on the following day, the Standard Times failed to report the
location of the proposed Esperanza School, stating only that the school would
be located in the “neighborhood of the Taylor and Hannigan schools.” Clearly,
this has been an underhanded and undemocratic venture from its commencement.
The problem with
this is that proper information regarding the possible implementation of this
school is not being disseminated, and parents and other community members are
being duped into believing that this school will be a cure for all of the ills
currently reported regarding ELL students in the NBPS district. This is simply
not so. First off, by denying ELL students the right to attend their
neighborhood schools, and by having the entire population of the ELL middle
school students be forcibly bussed to Roosevelt each day regardless of where
they live in the city, we are supporting segregation. Yes, I said segregation –
of which the definition according to the Encarta dictionary is as follows: the
practice of keeping ethnic, racial, religious, or gender groups
separate, especially by enforcing the use of separate schools,
transportation, housing, and other facilities, and usually
discriminating against a minority group. Secondly, the Esperanza school
prospectus makes the claim that the majority of ELL students live in the south
end of New Bedford. I can attest to the
fact that the majority of ELL students attending Roosevelt Middle School (57%)
currently live outside of the South End district and are bussed in each day. As
of Friday, October 12, 2012, there are 122 ELL students attending Roosevelt
(not including all of the FLEPs in the building), and according to the
prospectus for the Esperanza school, only 60 of these students at any given
time in grades 6-8 will be served by the proposed school. The questions are:
- · What will happen with the rest of the ELL middle school population?
- · And if the Esperanza school co-locates in the Roosevelt building, what will become of the students who attend their neighborhood middle school when 18 of their classrooms will be taken over by the proposed school?
- · And what will happen to the teachers who now have no classrooms to teach in?
- · For those teachers who are allowed to remain at Roosevelt, will they now be forced to teach class sizes of between 35 and 45 students to accommodate the displaced students whose right it is to attend that school?
- · Where will the funding come from to support the overhaul of Roosevelt to accommodate K-5 students? This funding should come from capital funds in the district, but are there any to support the likelihood of restructuring Roosevelt?
Another reason
given for Roosevelt being chosen as the ELL middle school and the site for the
proposed Esperanza school is because its population numbers are lower than both
Keith and Normandin Middle Schools. This is true; however, a simple solution
exists to remedy this problem. REDISTRICT the city in order to allow for more
feeder elementary schools to Roosevelt. This would provide the school with its
capacity number of students, all ELL students would be
able to attend their neighborhood middle schools, and the money that would be
spent on bussing students to and from Roosevelt and/or for the restructure of
Roosevelt to accommodate K-5 students could be used toward hiring ELL teachers for
those buildings that require them. Consistency across the board in utilizing an
ELL program that has been researched extensively and has been proven to be
effective in other urban school districts should be implemented, especially at
the high school level.
All this having
been said, I would like to respectfully submit a petition against the
implementation of an innovation school being implemented at Roosevelt Middle
School, signed by the majority of the faculty and staff that currently are
employed by the district in that building.
1 comment:
Bravo, Patty! You have worked tirelessly at getting the "truth" out there not only to your fellow colleagues, but to the general public. Somehow, it still seems like the underhanded few will still remain in power. Ms. Fernandes, as well as, others in the UIA are fully aware of what they are doing. Keep up the good work!
To quote Shakespeare," All that glitters is not gold, often have you heard that told."
Post a Comment