October
27, 2014
To: Members of the Board of Elementary and
Secondary Education
Mitchell Chester, Commissioner of
Education
From: Barbara Madeloni, President, Massachusetts
Teachers Association
Janet Anderson, Vice President,
Massachusetts Teachers Association
Re: Changes
Proposed by DESE to initial licensure and relicensure
On
Monday, October 20, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
released proposed changes to requirements for both initial licensure and
relicensure. A day later, the DESE held its first “town hall” hearing about
these proposals. These hearings were facilitated by the Keystone Center, but
DESE staff were present.
While
there are many questions to ask about these proposals that would allow us to
gain some clarity of meaning (e.g., what does “grit” mean as a requirement for
initial licensure?), the primary question is: How can anyone in good conscience
connect an employment evaluation to licensure when these are entirely different
areas of authority and oversight? We know of no other profession in which
licensure is contingent on employment evaluation. More insidiously, the
employment evaluations include student learning outcomes, thus connecting
relicensure to student test scores.
We are
asking the commissioner to rescind these recommendations in whole for the
following reasons:
1.
The
DESE is advancing policy options that almost exclusively base license
advancement and license renewal on the summative performance ratings in the
educator evaluation framework and the student impact rating derived from MCAS
growth scores and District-Determined Measures. This is a misuse of measures of
student learning and is counter to the DESE’s own assertions about how student
learning measures would be used.
2.
As
a professional organization representing approximately 80,000 licensed preK-12
practitioner-members, the MTA does not support either the design principles or
the policy options outlined in this document. To connect licensure to
evaluation is a serious breach of lines of authority and responsibility. The
state’s determination of having met requirements to teach should not and cannot
extend into performance on the job, which falls under the authority of school
administrators. Further, linking performance evaluations to licensure puts all
educators on notice: Be careful what you say and do or you risk not only your
job, but also your ability to teach or administer in Massachusetts schools.
3.
The
MTA does not support short-track preparation programs that allow unqualified
and underqualified individuals to enter classrooms as teachers of record
without the requisite knowledge and skills to be “classroom ready” on day one.
Too often, these underqualified individuals enter high-poverty, low-performing
schools, thus contributing to existing achievement gaps and the inequitable
distribution of highly effective practitioners.
4.
The
MTA decries the use of $550,000 in public funds to pay private vendors for this
project. The process employed by these vendors shows little or no interest in
engaging in meaningful dialogue about what is and is not effective in the
current licensure and relicensure processes. Educators report that they have
attended tightly controlled “town halls” in which the outcome seems
predetermined and voices of dissent are not welcome. We need meaningful
opportunities for input into the development of licensure regulations.
We urge
the commissioner and the board in the strongest possible terms to heed the
overwhelming opposition to these proposals from the people most directly
affected and to act immediately to withdraw the policy options currently being
considered.
Thank
you.
No comments:
Post a Comment