The MTA is asking the
Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to deny a waiver request that could
allow the New Heights Charter School to open in Brockton this year. If the
charter application is allowed to go forward, the MTA will once again join the
Brockton Education Association and the Brockton Public Schools, as well as many
parents and elected officials in Brockton, in asking the board to deny the
application.
Background.
Earlier this year, BESE adopted policies to bring the charter authorization
process in line with the 2010 Achievement Gap Act. That law emphasizes three
key policies relevant to this debate:
·
DESE must take student growth (i.e., MCAS
student growth percentiles), not just achievement (i.e., absolute score levels
on the MCAS), into consideration in school accountability ratings.
·
DESE must use a similar approach for calculating
which districts have student performance in the bottom 10 percent.
·
DESE staff determined that the first two
applicants in any year have to be in districts whose students were in the
bottom 10 percent.
Why include “growth”?
The argument for including growth measures was that achievement scores are
closely correlated with socioeconomic status. To put it simply, on average,
poor children don’t do as well as more affluent children on standardized tests.
Districts with low-income students argued that they shouldn’t be penalized
simply for educating poor children; they should be given some relief from burdensome
mandates if their student growth rates are strong.
How do charter
schools hurt these districts? One “penalty” most districts want to avoid is
being forced to accept and pay for a charter school against the will of a
majority of the elected officials and taxpayers in a community. The negative
impacts of a charter school include:
·
Financial: After an initial reimbursement
period, the charter school drains money from district schools.
·
Uneven playing field: Most charter
schools use enrollment practices that keep them from serving as many special
needs students, English language learners and low-income students as the
sending districts.
·
Undermines local control: Once a charter
is authorized by the state, decisions about how children will be educated there
are taken away from local elected officials and are given to an unelected
board, with oversight by state officials.
In short, when a Commonwealth charter school comes to town,
districts have to serve a higher-need population with fewer resources.
DESE adopts new
formula. DESE implemented a new achievement-plus-growth formula for school
accountability purposes in 2011, initially choosing a ratio of 80 percent
achievement to 20 percent growth. This year, DESE began the process of taking
the same approach in calculating the bottom 10 percent of districts for
purposes of meeting the new charter school requirements. DESE determined that
the ratio should be the same for both school accountability and for determining
the bottom 10 percent of districts, and revisited what that ratio should be. In
the course of that debate, some argued that growth should be given even more
weight, such as a 70/30 split. Others, including leaders of the charter school
industry, argued that the calculation should be based 100 percent on
achievement. After much debate, BESE approved a revised split of 75/25.
2014 charter
applicants affected. Meanwhile, the charter application process was moving
forward on a separate track and DESE advanced just two applications: one for
the New Heights Charter School in Brockton and the other for a regional school
to be based in Fitchburg. In early October, DESE staff realized that neither
Brockton nor, collectively, the Fitchburg regional districts were in the bottom
10 percent. Their growth scores elevated them out of that pool. (Indeed, they
would have been out of the bottom 10 percent based on the 80/20 split as well
as the 75/25 split that was ultimately adopted.) DESE staff told the applicants
they couldn’t move forward this year because the first two of any new charters
approved in a given year must be located in districts in the bottom 10 percent.
Waivers filed.
Both applicants filed for a waiver, saying they should be allowed to proceed.
The Fitchburg applicant subsequently followed a different route, changing the
makeup of the districts to be included in the regional pool to create a new
configuration of districts that falls into the bottom 10 percent. With that
change, the Fitchburg applicants were told they could proceed and the waiver
request was dropped. The Brockton applicant is proceeding with the waiver
request.
Hearing set. On
Oct. 30, DESE set a date of Nov. 5 for a hearing on the New Heights Charter
School waiver. The MTA is opposing that request based on a belief that the
intent of the Legislature was to disfavor locating charter schools in
districts, such as Brockton, that have worked very hard to provide their
students with a high-quality education even in the face of high poverty and
limited school resources and that are, in fact, showing improvement. If the
application is allowed to go forward, the MTA will join the BEA and others in
publicizing the many innovative and effective programs Brockton has
implemented, and will show how those efforts would be undermined by locating a charter
school in that community.
Produced by the Massachusetts Teachers Association, November 3, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment