I am writing this
to provide a better understanding of what is being taught in “OUR” children’s
schools. This is the current curriculum of what is known as Common Core. Common
Core was established by the Gates Foundation through a Gates funded project. This
foundation was established by the billionaire Bill Gates. The goal was to
promote and develop research in this education curriculum. It WAS created with
unevaluated standards out of Washington D.C. which has still not been evaluated
and/or validated by those who are teaching but is evaluated by this and other
foundations.
In 2010, the State
of Massachusetts adopted the Common Core when it was promised a part of the $250million
in Federal Race to the Top money. Well this money is all gone and we the City of
New Bedford are stuck paying for the bill to follow this common core
curriculum. It was not just the money that the State of Massachusetts signed
onto but also the Common Core standards for education.
These standards
are not sufficient to bringing our students to the top in education. This is
set up to bring ALL students to a level playing field. Shouldn’t we, as parents
and citizens, be pushing ALL of our students to go reach above and beyond what
they believe to be their limits? The best analogy I’ve heard to compare this is,
the slowest person will not catch up to the fastest person but the fastest
person can slow down and allow the slower person to catch up. As it is stated
by several City of New Bedford administrators and School Committee members,
Education is not a one size fits all approach. If they believe this, then why
are they not pushing back on the state and get them to stop trying to mandate
achievement using this one size fits all approach.
Did anyone on the
New Bedford School Committee speak with several of our higher education schools
and ask if these “New Standards” would benefit our children? If you’re curious
about this, they are going into college unprepared with math admission
standards. As an example, Algebra 1 is the key to advanced math study and recommends
that students study it in 8th grade which is/was the case under Massachusetts
standards. Common Core would, and does, delay ALGEBRA 1 until early in 10th
grade, which in turn prevents our students from reaching higher levels of math
in high school.
I have heard from
the New Bedford Public Schools administration, as well as PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of
Readiness for College and Careers) advocates, argue that these tests would better
prepare students for college and careers. But, Common Core ends with Algebra II
which is insufficient for students aiming for STEM (science, technology,
engineering, or math) majors.
One area that is upsetting
is that the education of our children is under local municipal control and that
municipalities DO NOT have to adopt the PARCC test. As it was stated back in
early to mid 2014 by the NBPS Superintendant, Pia Durkin, it would be a very good
idea to administer the PARCC exam because the state had adopted this test to be
effective in 2015/2016. This was NOT the case as the State legislature has not
adopted anything yet and that it will be coming up for a vote this year. Does the
general public know this? Parents needed to know, and should have been informed
by the NBPD administration, as well as the New Bedford School Committee, that
they could have opted out of this test.
There was never a
clear answer to this question when some parents had actually inquired about it.
Again when PARCC was first mentioned, it was stated that students would not be
held accountable for this exam when given in their classes. When some began to
question their child’s participation in the exam, several parents were told
that their child had to take the exam. Some were told that they, the parent,
could not opt out of the exam for their child and that it was the child that
needed to refuse their participation in the testing. How many of our children
would defy a teacher placing an exam in front of them and say, “I’m not taking
this” in fear of being sent to the principal and/or a punishment.
I know that I
won’t get an answer but are there any consequences for our students who refused
to take the PARCC exam? When I looked up information, I found that it is the
School Committee who has the statutory authority to enacted punishments for the
refusal unless State Law supersedes it. Another interesting area is that
Superintendants must follow what is set by School Committee and not the other
way around.
Here are some reasons that I take issue with the MCAS vs.
PARCC standards:
1) MCAS has a proven record and PARCC has no demonstrable
track record.
2) MCAS has made MA #1 in NAEP results and has been the key
to the MA “Education Miracle” and PARCC has no comparable results.
3) MCAS was developed by MA educators and PARCC was
developed outside of MA
4) MCAS was vetted through the public process with
transparency in every step; PARCC was developed behind closed doors,
copyrighted by a private entity and reviewed by a validation committee whose
members were required to sign a non-disclosure agreement as part of the review.
5) Well recognized experts with teaching experience were
part of the assessment development for MCAS; the teaching expertise of writers
for the multi-state consortium PARCC assessments is not a matter of public
record.
6) MCAS secures control of curriculum with the local school
districts; PARCC forces the adoption of a national curriculum in order to pass
the assessment.
Our U.S. Bill of
Rights, under the 9th and 10th amendments, is quite
clear. When it comes to education, the jurisdiction falls within each state and
not the federal government. The Race to the Top was the federal government’s
way of dangling the carrot in front of states to sign on and you guessed it,
Massachusetts did just that. But as I stated, that money is gone and our state
and out city are being left high and dry. When former governor Patrick, and
Head of the DOE, signed on for this money, did either of them do a cost
projection analysis? This is, in part, what we are seeing now and why the NBPS
administration is looking for such a high increase in the budget these past two
years.
Due to the lack of
foresight on all those involved, state government, state DOE, the City of NB
School Committee, it is the City of New Bedford taxpayer who is being stuck
with the bill. The approx. cost projection is costing approximately 16 BILLION
to align schools with texts and teachers for this common core curriculum. None
of this money is coming from the federal government any longer nor is it coming
from the billionaire dollar Gates Foundation. Those in charge may not have done
the projection but Pearson Publishing did. This company is making billions of
dollars off of not just the text books but also have the publishing rights for
the PARCC exams.
So I want the
citizens of NB to understand that the PARCC exam is a test where there are no
assessments in place. The drivers of this program have no experience and are
individuals hired by the foundation that have pushed their way into enacting
education on a federal level. More parents need to find out what is happening
to our education system state wide and know their rights as well. Keep in mind
that Massachusetts was at one time, #1 in education with its standards ad this
is why other states were, and are, waiting to see if our state will sign on.
I would like to know from each of the members of the New
Bedford School Committee, why did you sign on to administer the PARCC exam? I’m
sure that there are several other concerned citizens of our educational system
that would also like to know this answer. Will we get an answer? Only time will
tell. As it was stated by Mr. Tom Birmingham of The Patriot Ledger, “Let’s work
on building MCAS and not replace it with national standards and testing that
show little promise of replicating its success”.
We need to push
back against the DOE and let them know that you, our Elected officials, are
going to challenge these Mandated standards of PARCC that are being forced on
our children. The threats of withholding State Ch.70 monies are not possible as
the monies are not tied to MCAS results or any test. The MCAS is a school
performance evaluation and not connected to the teacher evaluations. With PARCC,
it is based on a teacher evaluation and this is one reason I see the big push.
We are pushing our veteran teachers out and replacing them with the less
experienced teachers. We need to stand behind all of our teachers and provide
them the necessary tools to teach our children and not threaten them with a
PARCC evaluation system. Look at the exit of several teachers, principals,
administrators, and staff support and ask yourselves WHY ARE THEY ALL LEAVING?
The truth being told to me by several is that they cannot work under a
threatening environment. This also goes for the non-extensions of principal
contracts. We are losing too many veteran educators in this system instead of
retaining them. When asked if there is a pattern to the mass exit, the response
is there is no pattern. Really? This is a satisfactory answer to our School
Committee?
On the PARCC exams
this year, they were titled as a “2015 Field Test Exam”. Basically this exam
was an experiment with our children as the test subjects. The issue we all
should have with this is that Pearson, a British owned Company, is making money
off the use of our children for their Field Test exam. In test experiments,
test subjects get paid for their participation and proctors get paid for
monitoring. So both our students and teachers should have been compensated, outside
of their normal pay, for proctoring these exams. Instead the students were all
“Forced” to take the exam and our teachers were “Mandated Volunteers” as proctors.
Pearson has bought and paid for all the rights to this exam and subject
materials.
Has anyone
questioned who are grading these exams? They, Pearson, have advertised both on
Craig’s list and through the Kelly Services Temporary Work agency for graders
with no education experience at all. The following is directly from their web
site.
Pay is approx.
12.00 through Pearson with additional incentives.
Requirements
- Conferred a minimum of a Bachelor’s Degree from an Accredited College or University
- Eligible to work in the United States
- U.S. residency
- Basic computer skills (keyboard, mouse)
- Ability to maintain a confidential work environment
- Access to a home or office computer that meets the requirements of the scoring system, internet service, and telephone connection. For security reasons, readers may not use shared office computers or work from institutional or public computer labs.
- Availability to work a minimum of 20 hours per week
- Teaching experience is preferred
We as a community need to
stand up for our children and make our voices heard in their education. As my
children are both grown adults, and proud graduates of the NBPS, I have no
horse in this race and will be your voice on the School Committee. Not just a
person representing special interest groups, pushing my own agenda, or just
being in agreement with the majority, but a person who will bring every
question to the committee and respond to them as well. I will represent, first
and foremost the students of this great city, parents, educators, staff, and
all of the citizens.
- Conferred a minimum of a Bachelor’s Degree from an Accredited College or University
- Eligible to work in the United States
- U.S. residency
- Basic computer skills (keyboard, mouse)
- Ability to maintain a confidential work environment
- Access to a home or office computer that meets the requirements of the scoring system, internet service, and telephone connection. For security reasons, readers may not use shared office computers or work from institutional or public computer labs.
- Availability to work a minimum of 20 hours per week
- Teaching experience is preferred
1 comment:
"Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas" Wikipedia
Post a Comment