The S-T’s most recent
harangue against Lou St. John and the
New Bedford Educators Association, again, begs the question about the
underpinnings of systemic failure at NB High School.
“The Climate of Fear”
at the heart of these failures, inevitably, starts at the top. Not once has the
S-T ever insinuated that the safety of staff and students at NBHS resides in
the policies and practices of administration.
If, in fact, the
overriding concern at any school is to enforce anti-bullying, anti- violence
and proper comportment of any kind – and it must be- the leaders of the school
must immerse themselves in the process from the first day staff and students arrive for orientation. Discipline in
schools begins at the top on day number
one.
Teachers are on the front lines every day
observing their students at lockers, during passing times, at lunch, within the
classroom and are the day to day catalysts for limit-setting. But the greatest
responsibility is in the hands of administration which must insinuate itself
into meting out firm, fair and consistent consequences in response to
violators. Teachers are powerless if not supported by supervisors.
Teachers know these
ground rules implicitly. They know the “safety” of their classroom is
compromised when perpetrators of bad conduct are not properly disciplined.
Students are clinical
about these ground rules, too. Students know the palpable “fear” of an unsafe classroom where
the bullies and the disruptors reign supreme- when the central office fails to
support the efforts of teachers who attempt to make classrooms laboratories of
learning, not chaos.
Lack of safety in the
school environment- in classrooms, halls, cafeteria- begets the “Climate of
Fear” that Mr. St.John and the teachers are describing. Once the staff is no
longer in charge and behaviors are out of control, as appears to be the
situation at NBHS, no curriculum or pedagogy will reverse the trend. Only a
staunch administration setting limits can do it.
And, apparently, the
S-T does not understand this or is unwilling to acknowledge the basic tenet of
school success based upon its statement that, “The greater fear, of course, has
bubbled to the surface, and it involves job security, not personal safety. That
narrative has been a non-starter for the New Bedford Educators Association as
well, once the facts and context are revealed.”
From the beginning the
narrative from union leader St. John is that the scapegoating of teachers for
what is, essentially, a systemic failure of administrative oversight, is wrong.
When classrooms are unsafe because of the neglect of administration to enforce
discipline, when the well-behaving, motivated students in the same classroom
are being denied a proper education, then it is time to steer away from
misplacing responsibility.
No influx of “
motivated, qualified teachers elsewhere in the district … attracted to the
challenge of recovering success for New Bedford High School” and no turnover
plan that fires 29% of the teachers “ designed to put motivated, certified
teachers into the game,” will change the environment that, currently exists at
NBHS.
It is a “Climate of
Fear” at NBHS. Make no mistake about that it. NBHS is an institution adrift
where the teachers and students are not being supported by a systemic failure
of administration to support teachers by enforcing limits for behavior. Proper,
consistent limit-setting will create an environment for academic success across
the board for all demographics- poor, English Language Learners, Special
Education- for all students who follow the rules and do their best every day.
Sincerely yours:
Bruce C. Ditata,
The S-T’s most recent
harangue against Lou St. John and the
New Bedford Educators Association, again, begs the question about the
underpinnings of systemic failure at NB High School.
“The Climate of Fear”
at the heart of these failures, inevitably, starts at the top. Not once has the
S-T ever insinuated that the safety of staff and students at NBHS resides in
the policies and practices of administration.
If, in fact, the
overriding concern at any school is to enforce anti-bullying, anti- violence
and proper comportment of any kind – and it must be- the leaders of the school
must immerse themselves in the process from the first day staff and students arrive for orientation. Discipline in
schools begins at the top on day number
one.
Teachers are on the front lines every day
observing their students at lockers, during passing times, at lunch, within the
classroom and are the day to day catalysts for limit-setting. But the greatest
responsibility is in the hands of administration which must insinuate itself
into meting out firm, fair and consistent consequences in response to
violators. Teachers are powerless if not supported by supervisors.
Teachers know these
ground rules implicitly. They know the “safety” of their classroom is
compromised when perpetrators of bad conduct are not properly disciplined.
Students are clinical
about these ground rules, too. Students know the palpable “fear” of an unsafe classroom where
the bullies and the disruptors reign supreme- when the central office fails to
support the efforts of teachers who attempt to make classrooms laboratories of
learning, not chaos.
Lack of safety in the
school environment- in classrooms, halls, cafeteria- begets the “Climate of
Fear” that Mr. St.John and the teachers are describing. Once the staff is no
longer in charge and behaviors are out of control, as appears to be the
situation at NBHS, no curriculum or pedagogy will reverse the trend. Only a
staunch administration setting limits can do it.
And, apparently, the
S-T does not understand this or is unwilling to acknowledge the basic tenet of
school success based upon its statement that, “The greater fear, of course, has
bubbled to the surface, and it involves job security, not personal safety. That
narrative has been a non-starter for the New Bedford Educators Association as
well, once the facts and context are revealed.”
From the beginning the
narrative from union leader St. John is that the scapegoating of teachers for
what is, essentially, a systemic failure of administrative oversight, is wrong.
When classrooms are unsafe because of the neglect of administration to enforce
discipline, when the well-behaving, motivated students in the same classroom
are being denied a proper education, then it is time to steer away from
misplacing responsibility.
No influx of “
motivated, qualified teachers elsewhere in the district … attracted to the
challenge of recovering success for New Bedford High School” and no turnover
plan that fires 29% of the teachers “ designed to put motivated, certified
teachers into the game,” will change the environment that, currently exists at
NBHS.
It is a “Climate of
Fear” at NBHS. Make no mistake about that it. NBHS is an institution adrift
where the teachers and students are not being supported by a systemic failure
of administration to support teachers by enforcing limits for behavior. Proper,
consistent limit-setting will create an environment for academic success across
the board for all demographics- poor, English Language Learners, Special
Education- for all students who follow the rules and do their best every day.
Sincerely yours:
19 comments:
It was extremely demeaning to have a housemaster return a conduct card to me the next day because an unimportant piece of information was missing (something I did not have access to). This housemaster knew full well that returning the card the next day would defeat the purpose and, that conduct card contained all the pertinent information. This is the message they perpetuate and the method to avert dealing with a situation. The disrespect toward teachers is surmountable.
Thank you Bruce! Once again, you have stated the truth very eloquently. I'm proud to know you!
I agree with the first post. Housemasters returning conduct cards to us for insufficient information missing shows that they are not supportive of teachers thus they, housemaster, are a major part of the problem.
Want to know what is wrong with the system, all you have to do is look from the TOP administrators down. Fire them ALL.
One of the first places administration must begin is by not fearing the reprisals of parents who threaten with "going to the superintendent" or " getting a lawyer". There are parents in this district whose first response to their child being disciplined is to create drama where there is none, to threaten the authority of the school, and to enable their child as always being right and the teachers as always being in error and "out to get their kid". This only stops when administration stands up to these bullies and sets limits for inappropriate behavior on the part of the adults involved. Abusive parents should be escorted out of buildings and asked not to return until they can maintain some semblance of propriety and reasonable behavior themselves.
Why even bother to submit cc. Teachers and students know the outcome. Confiscations of cell phones and other electronics fell to the wayside, but that is minimal compared to teacher abuse.
If you look at other solid urban districts who encounter belligerent parents, the protocol for dealing with them is set in stone and consistent. NBPS is way behind the times. Due to this lackadaisical and non-proactive approach, the mole hill has evolved into a mountain. This falls on the shoulders of administration and not the teachers. We have only so much control over such matters. The buck stops here. Place the blame and incompetence where it really belongs. Teachers are scapegoats. That is the bottom line.
When you hire administrators because of who they know or how they look regardless of experience or credentials, it is a recipe for disaster. NBHS had to learn the hard way and teachers are paying the price. When PRAB hires top-level administrators, who come in and out like New England weather, they better start with background checks and past histories. This district is a magnet for fruit flies.
Top HS administrators are being removed. That's been the case since September.
Durkin brings in her own people with very large salaries and will continue to do so.
There is no consistency among houses when it comes to discipline practices.
The proverbial batch of "bad apples"-mayor, superintendent, and SC.
Hmmmmmmm.... "Housemasters returning conduct cards to us for insufficient information missing". Let me guess.... ??????
We need to find a cohesive and comprehensive way to handle issues. Those three women seem to try to do their best but are just as much under the gun as the rest of us, maybe more. They are getting bashed by us and upper level people. There is no way these people can keep the lid on the building. We need to support each other in the best way possible. The changes that are being proposed seem not to include any locals! Let's show these interlopers what we are made of. I will not allow the destruction of my school by outsiders especially Teach for America! Some of those in high and lofty places need to understand who WE are!
I don't think Pia was rigorous enough in getting parents to come to her turnaround meeting! Only 15 parents showed up out of more than 2000 ! Now that was out of her control, just like homelessness, drugs, abuse, lack of discipline at home, angry kids who constantly disrupt class are out of the teacher's control. The difference here is the teachers are being blamed for issues that are out of our control. I think Pia should review her rigorous approach and she should be let go!
Thank you ! I only wish the administration and our useless mayor had your wisdom!
Have we forgotten about the new Teacher Evaluations and how our housemasters gave many of us a "Needs Improvement" because they were told to? Is that standing behind the teachers? No, it makes them look good because we are not teaching correctly.
Some administrators at NBHS need anti-bullying training so they can stop abusing their teachers! Book reports, daily lesson plans, CFU charts and articles are going to make no difference until we deal with the root problem - no discipline consequences for disruptive students. What kind of MAN stamds by and watches one of his--female--teachers being verbally abused and disrespected by students and doesn't lift a finger or bat an eyelid to intervene? This is no gentleman, folks!
Remember when they gave needs improvement to people they made sure they didn't choose their friends
Your so right at my school the principal made sure all her stool pigeons got good evaluations and her friends,even though they talk about her behind her back.
Post a Comment